📊Part of The Seoul Food Research Program→

Tteokbokki at Gwangjang, Mangwon and Namdaemun: 148 Reviews Read

Travel Analysts

📄At Gwangjang Market, 7 of 33 reviewers who judged the tteokbokki did not like it. At Namdaemun Market all 8 did. What 148 reviews say, market by market.

A steel tray of tteokbokki, rice cakes in red chili sauce, with a ladle resting in it on a street stall counter beside stacked bowls of wrapped side dishes

💡Quick Answer

Is the tteokbokki at Gwangjang Market good? Of the five dishes we have read there, it has the highest share of unhappy eaters: of 33 reviewers who say how it tasted, 22 call it good, 4 ordinary and 7 did not like it, four of those because it was too sweet or had sat in its sauce. At Mangwon Market 14 of 18 liked it, and at Namdaemun Market all 8 did. Reviewers at Gwangjang Market report 4,000 won a plate in 2025 and 2026. We did not verify current prices.

Explore the full guide & expert tips ➜

Tteokbokki Is the Dish Gwangjang Market Gets Marked Down For

Tteokbokki is rice cakes in red chili sauce, and trays of it line the food aisles of Seoul’s markets. We read the 148 reviews that name it in our samples of three markets, in the language each was written in.

🌶️ Tteokbokki in the reviews	Gwangjang Market (1,458)	Mangwon Market (1,089)	Namdaemun Market (1,376)
Reviews that name it	5.8% (84)	4.3% (47)	1.2% (17)
Say how theirs tasted	33 reviews	18 reviews	8 reviews
✅ Say it was good	22	14	8
🟡 Call it ordinary	4	1	0
❌ Did not like it	7	3	0

At Gwangjang Market it is named in 84 reviews, and it is the only dish we track there that is named more often by unhappy visitors than by happy ones: 6.6% (16) of the reviews with three stars or fewer, against 5.6% (68) of those with four or five. Six of those sixteen low reviews are written in Korean.

The verdicts say the same thing more plainly. We have now read five dishes at Gwangjang Market review by review:

Dish at Gwangjang Market	Reviewers who say how it tasted	✅ Good	❌ Did not like it
Yukhoe (raw beef)	39	92.3% (36)	5.1% (2)
Live octopus	24	79.2% (19)	12.5% (3)
Gimbap	42	78.6% (33)	2.4% (1)
Bindaetteok (mung bean pancake)	55	70.9% (39)	14.5% (8)
Tteokbokki	33	66.7% (22)	21.2% (7)

Two reviewers in three who judged the tteokbokki liked it. For every other dish in the table the figure is higher, and one in five did not like it.

The trade-off: twenty-two people still call it good. It is the dish at this market where the stall you pick matters most, and the reviews say why.

What the Seven Unhappy Reviewers Say

All seven negative verdicts at Gwangjang Market come from reviews of three stars or lower. Three are written in Korean, three in English and one in German. Their reasons fall into two groups.

It was too sweet. Two Korean reviewers say so, one of them remembering it as better a few years ago, and a third reviewer who rated a named stall seven out of ten gives the same reason. The other complaints are about flavor in general:

The tteokbokki and sundae was a hard pass for me after my first bite. — Google Maps review of Gwangjang Market, 1 star, October 2025

I ate bibimbap and teokbokki, but the taste was not really good. — TripAdvisor review of Gwangjang Market, 3 stars, November 2019

It had been sitting. A German-language reviewer thought the rice cakes had been in the sauce a long time. A Korean reviewer, visiting with a friend from abroad, says the plate that arrived was a mix of leftover and freshly made tteokbokki. And a four-star review in Chinese warns readers to watch for tteokbokki being reused. In the separate set of low-rated reviews that we read for quotations and never count, one visitor describes seeing it:

the lady scooped up the unfinished tteokbokki from our plate and mixed it back with her unsold tteokbokki — Google Maps review of Gwangjang Market, 1 star, October 2023

These are reviewers’ accounts of single stalls on single days, and we have no way to check them. They are here because they repeat, in four languages, between 2023 and 2026.

Two more Korean reviewers do not describe a plate at all. They tell readers not to eat tteokbokki there, one citing prices and the other citing hygiene at the stalls in the middle of the market.

The trade-off: a tray of tteokbokki is cooked in advance and kept warm, which is what makes it fast and cheap. The same tray is what the unhappy reviewers are describing.

What the 22 Happy Ones Say

The reviewers who liked it at Gwangjang Market describe rice cakes that are large, soft and chewy, and a sauce that is milder than its color. Two say it was bright red and not spicy.

yummy chewy teokbokki — Google Maps review of Gwangjang Market, 5 stars, June 2026

Tried the great spicy tteokbokki — TripAdvisor review of Gwangjang Market, 4 stars, October 2019

A Korean reviewer offers the one piece of selection advice in the sample. The gimbap, they say, is nearly the same everywhere, and the tteokbokki is where stalls differ: some are generous with the sauce and some are not, and you can see the difference. Look for the tray where the rice cakes are coated dark red.

Three reviews name a price at Gwangjang Market: 4,000 won in October 2025 and again in July 2026, and 3,000 won in December 2019. The July 2026 reviewer adds that the posted price was 4,000 and the bill came to several thousand more. One reviewer in June 2025 paid 10,000 won for a set of gimbap, tteokbokki and blood sausage, and another says tteokbokki and fish cake cost the same at every stall, so any that looks good will do. We did not verify current prices.

The trade-off: the advice to look before sitting costs nothing and it is the only filter these reviews offer. It will not tell you how sweet the sauce is.

Mangwon Market: Liked by Visitors, Shrugged at by Neighbors

At Mangwon Market 14 of the 18 reviewers who judged the tteokbokki liked it, and some of the praise is strong:

his tteokbokki is the best i ever had — Google Maps review of Mangwon Market, 5 stars, April 2024

perfectly spicy and chewy — Google Maps review of Mangwon Market, 5 stars, September 2025

A reviewer writing in Chinese, who had eaten tteokbokki four times in Korea, calls the one at Mangwon Market the cheapest and the best. Two reviewers carried theirs to the Han River park for a picnic.

The dissent comes from people who live nearby. One Korean reviewer says the market has good fritters and fish cake and no stall with good tteokbokki. Another, a local, calls the tteokbokki and fried chicken neither especially good nor cheap, and made for visitors.

Three reviews complain about how a tteokbokki stall treated them. In one, a Korean reviewer asked how spicy it was, was told it was not spicy at all, and watched a Japanese friend fail to eat a single bite.

One reviewer who lists vegan-friendly food at Mangwon Market includes it with a caution:

Tteokbokki (ask to make sure there are no fish sauce) — Google Maps review of Mangwon Market, 5 stars, May 2026

The trade-off: visitors rate Mangwon Market’s tteokbokki well and two locals say it is nothing special. Both can be true; they are comparing it with different things.

Namdaemun Market: Few Mentions, No Complaints

Only 17 of the 1,376 reviews of Namdaemun Market name tteokbokki, and none of them has three stars or fewer. Eight say how it tasted, and all eight liked it.

The sauce for the topokki is the best. — Google Maps review of Namdaemun Market, 5 stars, March 2026

One reviewer, in mid-2025, paid 5,000 won for a portion they found small and very chewy. The menu said no spicy, and it was a little spicy anyway.

The trade-off: eight verdicts are too few to call Namdaemun Market the better place for tteokbokki. What the sample shows is that nobody who wrote about it there was disappointed.

Methodology

Figures come from the SeoulFoodTour research corpus. This article uses three samples of rated reviews from Google Maps and TripAdvisor, each collected without filtering by rating: 1,458 reviews of Gwangjang Market, 1,089 of Mangwon Market and 1,376 of Namdaemun Market.

What counts as naming the dish. A review is counted when it names tteokbokki in English, Korean, Japanese or Chinese, in any of the spellings reviewers use. That gives 148 reviews: 84, 47 and 17. Two reviews of Gwangjang Market that mention tteokbokki only while recommending another market are not counted.

How they were sorted. All 148 were read in full. A review counts as a verdict only when the reviewer ate the tteokbokki and says how it was: 59 do. A review that tells others not to order it without describing a plate is not a verdict and is reported separately.

The dish comparison. The table of five dishes at Gwangjang Market uses verdicts sorted the same way in our articles on each dish, all from the same 1,458 reviews. The groups are small, so every cell shows its count.

The second set. A separate pass aimed at low ratings added reviews that we use for reading and for quotations and never count. One quotation in this article comes from it and is introduced as such.

Quotations. Every quotation is from a review written in English and is reproduced exactly as it appears in the original record, spelling included. Reviews in other languages are counted and described in our words, never quoted.

What this article does not do. It does not verify prices, and it cannot confirm what any reviewer says they saw at a stall. A review records one person’s account of one day.

About the Author

Intercoper Curator Team

Travel Analysts

Our team researches and curates tour experiences. We combine local knowledge with rigorous verification to recommend only tours worth your time.

👤 About

📚 Related Articles

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is tteokbokki?+

Tteokbokki is chewy rice cakes cooked in a red chili sauce, sold from trays at market stalls and often eaten with fish cake or gimbap. Reviewers describe it as sweet and spicy, and several note that it looks hotter than it tastes.

Is the tteokbokki at Gwangjang Market good?+

It divides people more than any other dish we have read there. Of 33 reviewers who say how it tasted, 22 call it good, 4 call it ordinary and 7 did not like it. All seven negative verdicts come from reviews of three stars or lower, and three of them are written in Korean.

Is tteokbokki very spicy?+

It varies, and reviewers were surprised in both directions. Two at Gwangjang Market say theirs was bright red and not spicy. At Mangwon Market a Korean reviewer was told the tteokbokki was not spicy and a Japanese friend could not eat it. At Namdaemun Market one found a plate marked no spicy to be slightly hot.

How much is tteokbokki at Seoul’s markets?+

At Gwangjang Market, reviewers report 4,000 won a plate in October 2025 and July 2026, and 3,000 won in December 2019. At Namdaemun Market one reports 5,000 won for a small portion in mid-2025. We did not verify current prices.

Which Seoul market has the best tteokbokki?+

Reviews cannot rank them, but they do differ. At Namdaemun Market all 8 reviewers who judged it liked it. At Mangwon Market 14 of 18 did, and at Gwangjang Market 22 of 33. Namdaemun Market has the fewest reviews that mention the dish at all.

Is tteokbokki vegetarian?+

Not reliably. One reviewer who lists vegan-friendly food at Mangwon Market includes tteokbokki with the advice to ask whether it contains fish sauce, and reviewers often describe it served with fish cake. We cannot confirm any stall’s recipe.