📊Part of The Seoul Food Research Program→

Do You Need Korean at Seoul’s Markets? 121 Reviews on Language

Travel Analysts

📄In 121 reviews of Gwangjang Market, Namdaemun Market and Mangwon Market, 14 say vendors spoke English and 10 say they did not. What worked instead.

A market alley in Seoul crowded with Korean-language signs, with vendors in red aprons at their stalls and picture menus of stews on boards in the foreground

💡Quick Answer

Do vendors speak English at Seoul’s markets? Sometimes. Of 3,923 reviews of Gwangjang Market, Namdaemun Market and Mangwon Market, 121 say something about language. Fourteen report vendors who spoke English and ten report that they did not. Chinese is reported more often, in 26 reviews, and so is Japanese, in 17. What reviewers used instead of Korean: translated or picture menus at Gwangjang Market (14 reviews), pointing (12), and the multilingual information guides at Namdaemun Market (22).

Explore the full guide & expert tips ➜

The Answer Depends on Which Language You Bring

Whether you can order without Korean is one of the first things visitors ask about Seoul’s markets. We searched our samples of rated reviews of Gwangjang Market, Namdaemun Market and Mangwon Market for anything about language, in every language the reviews are written in, and read every match. One hundred and twenty-one say something concrete.

🗣️ Language reviewers say vendors spoke or understood	Three markets	Gwangjang Market	Namdaemun Market	Mangwon Market
Chinese	26 reviews	18	6	2
Japanese	17 reviews	9	8	0
English	14 reviews	5	7	2
Indonesian	2 reviews	0	2	0
❌ Say English was not spoken	10 reviews	2	6	2

English is the language with the most divided record. Fourteen reviews report vendors who spoke it and ten report that they did not.

Some of the stalls were very proficient in English and very friendly! — Google Maps review of Gwangjang Market, 4 stars, June 2025

becomes a problem especially when you are in the restaurants eating — TripAdvisor review of Namdaemun Market, 4 stars, January 2020

Chinese and Japanese are reported far more one-sidedly. Twenty-six reviews say a vendor spoke Chinese and one describes a barrier. Seventeen say Japanese was understood, some of them emphatically, and two say it was not. One reviewer of Namdaemun Market adds an observation about age:

Surprisingly you will get the younger vendors speak English to you. — Google Maps review of Namdaemun Market, 5 stars, May 2026

The trade-off: these counts record who chose to write about language, in which language. A reviewer writing in Japanese reports on Japanese. They show what visitors found, not what share of stalls can serve you.

Three Markets, Three Ways of Getting By

What reviewers report	Gwangjang Market (1,458)	Namdaemun Market (1,376)	Mangwon Market (1,089)
Say something about language	4.3% (62)	3.6% (49)	0.9% (10)
✅ A vendor understood a foreign language	28 reviews	22 reviews	6 reviews
❌ Language was a barrier	6 reviews	8 reviews	3 reviews
📋 A translated or picture menu	14 reviews	2 reviews	none reported
👉 Ordered by pointing or gestures	12 reviews	none reported	none reported
📱 Used a translation app	2 reviews	3 reviews	none reported
🟥 Information guides who speak other languages	11 reviews	22 reviews	1 review

The three markets solve the problem differently. At Gwangjang Market it is the menus and the food on display. At Namdaemun Market it is people: guides in red who speak several languages. At Mangwon Market, which draws fewer tourists, hardly anyone writes about language at all.

Across the three, 56 reviews report a vendor who understood a foreign language and 17 describe language as a barrier. Sixteen of the 17 still rated the market three stars or higher.

The trade-off: the markets most set up for foreign visitors are also the ones where reviewers report being overcharged. The section on money below is about that overlap.

Gwangjang Market: Menus and Pointing Do the Work

Fourteen reviews of Gwangjang Market mention menus a visitor can read: five in English, five in Japanese and five with photos. One lists English, Chinese and Japanese together.

Almost every menu has an english version. — Google Maps review of Gwangjang Market, 5 stars, December 2025

All menus are in English — TripAdvisor review of Gwangjang Market, 5 stars, September 2019

Twelve describe ordering by pointing or by gesture, because the food sits in front of the customer.

through hand gestures and broken Korean/English, we understood each other perfectly — Google Maps review of Gwangjang Market, 5 stars, March 2026

We communicated in sign language. — TripAdvisor review of Gwangjang Market, 5 stars, October 2019

One reviewer who speaks no Korean chose a sit-down restaurant over the stalls for exactly this reason: it had a proper menu with pictures. Another describes a vendor showing how to eat a dish by gesture.

Twenty-eight reviews report vendors at Gwangjang Market who understood a foreign language. Eighteen of them are about Chinese, and eleven of those eighteen concern the bedding shops rather than the food stalls. Nine are about Japanese and five about English. Eleven mention information staff inside the market, who hand out maps and, in three reviews, speak Chinese or Japanese.

There are guides within the market who handed me a map and spoke various foreign languages — Google Maps review of Gwangjang Market, 5 stars, September 2025

The trade-off: pointing gets you the dish. It does not get you the price, the portion or a different sauce, and the next section but one is about what happens then.

Namdaemun Market: Ask the Guides in Red

Twenty-two reviews of Namdaemun Market mention information guides, and thirteen describe them by their red jackets, vests or uniforms. Two reviewers call them Red Angels.

look out for their tourist guides in red jackets called the Red Angels — Google Maps review of Namdaemun Market, 5 stars, June 2024

They have english-speaking personnel and other language experts that you can talk to — TripAdvisor review of Namdaemun Market, 5 stars, August 2019

Reviewers say the guides stand at the main crossings, hand out a map of the market’s sections and answer in English, Japanese or Chinese. A Japanese reviewer describes a badge on the guide’s left arm that names the languages they speak, so a visitor can pick the right person. Reviewers used them to find a shoe shop, a lunch alley and a restaurant for dinner.

Find one of the red vest tourist info helper & ask for a Namdaemun map — Google Maps review of Namdaemun Market, 5 stars, July 2024

Menus are a different story. Only two reviews mention anything a visitor could read, one of them a vendor who labels the options with letters. One reviewer is blunt about the rest:

the menu are all in Korean so make sure you come with a translator app — TripAdvisor review of Namdaemun Market, 5 stars, July 2023

Twenty-two reviews report vendors who understood a foreign language: eight Japanese, seven English, six Chinese and two Indonesian. Eight describe a barrier, six of them about English.

The trade-off: the guides solve finding things. They are not at the table when you order, and the reviews that describe trouble ordering at Namdaemun Market are about its food alleys and restaurants.

Where the Language Gap Costs Money

Four reviews of Gwangjang Market tie the language gap to the bill. Three are written in Japanese and one in Chinese. Two Japanese groups ordered one plate each by pointing and holding up fingers, received extra plates they took for a shared serving, and were charged for all of them. A third had a vendor who spoke only Korean. The Chinese-language reviewer was short-changed and writes that with no shared language there was nothing to do but accept it.

Our article on Gwangjang Market counts eighteen low reviews that describe a problem with the bill itself. These four are the ones in which the reviewer names language as part of it.

At Namdaemun Market the accounts are about treatment more than money. A reviewer who explained through a translation app that two people wanted to share one meal describes what followed:

Even after explaining through Papago, her voice was raised and it became uncomfortable, so we decided to leave. — Google Maps review of Namdaemun Market, 4 stars, November 2025

A Japanese reviewer who understands Korean heard what a vendor said about them after they declined to buy. Three reviewers report the reverse: a little Korean improved the service, and in one case a Korean-speaking friend challenged a price on the spot.

The trade-off: not speaking Korean rarely stops anyone from eating. What it removes is the ability to object. One of the Japanese reviewers ends with advice: order one item at a time, or use the stalls where you pay as the food is handed over.

Mangwon Market: Fewer Tourists, Fewer Words

Only ten reviews of Mangwon Market say anything about language. Six report vendors who coped, and three say English or Japanese is rarely understood.

the shopkeepers are familiar enough with foreigners who don’t speak Korean that it’s easy to interact with them — Google Maps review of Mangwon Market, 5 stars, November 2023

sellers rarely speak English and may be a discomfort for beginner travelers — Google Maps review of Mangwon Market, 5 stars, April 2026

A Korean reviewer was surprised to hear a stallholder speak fluent Chinese. No review of Mangwon Market mentions a translated menu.

The trade-off: the market with the fewest tourist complaints is also the one with the least written for tourists. Ten reviews are too few to say more.

Methodology

Figures come from the SeoulFoodTour research corpus. This article uses three samples of rated reviews from Google Maps and TripAdvisor, each collected without filtering by rating: 1,458 reviews of Gwangjang Market, 1,376 of Namdaemun Market and 1,089 of Mangwon Market, 3,923 in all.

What was read. A wide search for words about language, menus, pointing, translation and information staff, in every language in the samples, matched 164 reviews. All were read in full. Forty-five used those words about something else and were set aside, leaving 119. Two further searches, one for menus and ways of ordering and one for the information guides, added two reviews about ordering without a shared language, for 121 in all: 62, 49 and 10. They also found nine reviews that mention the guides without saying anything about language; those are counted in the guides row and nowhere else.

How they were sorted. Each review was placed by hand in every row it supports, so a review can count in several. A vendor counts as understanding a language when the reviewer says so, or describes being served in it. Counts are floors: a review that got by without mentioning language is not here.

Who is writing. Of the 121 reviews, 39 are written in English, 42 in Japanese and 32 in Chinese. Reviewers mostly report on their own language, so the comparison between languages reflects who visits and writes as much as what vendors speak.

Quotations. Every quotation is from a review written in English and is reproduced exactly as it appears in the original record, spelling included. Reviews in other languages are counted and described in our words, never quoted.

What this article does not do. It does not verify what any stall offers today, and it does not measure how many vendors speak a given language. It reports what 121 visitors wrote.

About the Author

Intercoper Curator Team

Travel Analysts

Our team researches and curates tour experiences. We combine local knowledge with rigorous verification to recommend only tours worth your time.

👤 About

📚 Related Articles

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do vendors speak English at Gwangjang Market?+

Some do. Five reviews of Gwangjang Market report vendors who spoke English and two report that they did not. What reviewers lean on more is the menus: 14 reviews mention menus translated into English or Japanese or printed with photos, and 12 describe ordering by pointing or gesture.

Do I need to speak Korean to order at Seoul’s markets?+

Most reviewers who raise it say no. Fifty-six reviews across Gwangjang Market, Namdaemun Market and Mangwon Market report a vendor who understood a foreign language, against 17 that describe language as a barrier. Pointing, picture menus and translation apps cover most of the rest.

Who are the people in red at Namdaemun Market?+

Twenty-two reviews of Namdaemun Market mention information guides, and thirteen describe them as wearing red; two call them Red Angels. Reviewers say they speak English, Japanese and Chinese, hand out maps and point visitors to the right section. One notes a badge on the arm showing which language each guide speaks.

Is Japanese understood at Seoul’s markets?+

Seventeen reviews say so, nine at Gwangjang Market and eight at Namdaemun Market, and five mention Japanese menus at Gwangjang Market. One reviewer of Mangwon Market says Japanese is basically not understood there.

Is Chinese understood at Seoul’s markets?+

It is the language reviewers report most: 26 reviews. Eighteen are about Gwangjang Market, and eleven of those are about the bedding shops, where several reviewers say the staff are from Taiwan. One reviewer says a language barrier kept them from disputing wrong change.

Do I need a translation app at Seoul’s markets?+

Five reviews mention using one. At Namdaemun Market one reviewer says the menus were all in Korean and advises bringing a translator app, and another used one to read ingredients. At Gwangjang Market two say a phone translation of the menu was enough.

Can not speaking Korean get you overcharged?+

Four reviews of Gwangjang Market connect the two: reviewers who ordered by pointing, or whose vendor spoke only Korean, describe extra plates or wrong change they could not argue about. Three other reviewers say that speaking some Korean improved how they were treated. These are single accounts, not a rate.